[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17585096#comment-17585096
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-15342:
-------------------------------------
When we release Solr 9.1 and craft the release highlights; it's going to really
important to spell out the potential need for solrj-zookeeper. Lots of users
are going to add this.
I'll copy some bits added in the ref guide solr-upgrade-notes.adoc:
{quote}SolrJ is beginning to be split up. If you use ZooKeeper coordinates to
create a `CloudSolrClient`, you will need to add a dependency on
`solrj-zookeeper`.
Instead, consider migrating to use of specifying a list of Solr URLs in the
client's builder.
Not only does this reduce dependencies, but it improves security by being able
to limit ZooKeeper access.
{quote}
In retrospect, `solr-solrj-zookeeper` is actually the artifact ID (the extra
`solr-` up front).
> Separate out a SolrJ-Zookeeper module
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-15342
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15342
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: SolrJ
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 9.1
>
> Time Spent: 10h 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Let's create a new "SolrJ-Zookeeper" module by refactoring out the ZooKeeper
> related code out of the existing SolrJ module. This allows clients that
> don't want to talk to ZooKeeper to use the SolrJ module without transitive
> dependencies for ZooKeeper or Netty (Netty is used by ZK for SSL).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
