[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17585096#comment-17585096
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-15342:
-------------------------------------

When we release Solr 9.1 and craft the release highlights; it's going to really 
important to spell out the potential need for solrj-zookeeper.  Lots of users 
are going to add this.

I'll copy some bits added in the ref guide solr-upgrade-notes.adoc:
{quote}SolrJ is beginning to be split up. If you use ZooKeeper coordinates to 
create a `CloudSolrClient`, you will need to add a dependency on 
`solrj-zookeeper`.
Instead, consider migrating to use of specifying a list of Solr URLs in the 
client's builder.
Not only does this reduce dependencies, but it improves security by being able 
to limit ZooKeeper access.
{quote}
In retrospect, `solr-solrj-zookeeper` is actually the artifact ID (the extra 
`solr-` up front).

> Separate out a SolrJ-Zookeeper module
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-15342
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15342
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: SolrJ
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Assignee: David Smiley
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 9.1
>
>          Time Spent: 10h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Let's create a new "SolrJ-Zookeeper" module by refactoring out the ZooKeeper 
> related code out of the existing SolrJ module.  This allows clients that 
> don't want to talk to ZooKeeper to use the SolrJ module without transitive 
> dependencies for ZooKeeper or Netty (Netty is used by ZK for SSL).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to