[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christine Poerschke resolved SOLR-16111.
----------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 9.1
main (10.0)
Resolution: Fixed
> hl.queryFieldPattern support (advanced alternative to hl.requireFieldMatch)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-16111
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16111
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: highlighter
> Reporter: Christine Poerschke
> Assignee: Christine Poerschke
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 9.1, main (10.0)
>
> Time Spent: 3h 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Use case: a search referencing multiple fields and highlighting is required
> for one of the fields: {{q=fieldA:one OR fieldB:two OR fieldC:three}}
> {{hl.fl=fieldA}}
> * {{hl.requireFieldMatch=true}} can be used if highlighting of the terms
> ("two", "three") from the fieldB and fieldC is a problem.
> * {{hl.q=fieldA:one OR fieldB:two}} can be used if highlighting of the fieldB
> term is good but fieldC terms are a problem.
> _New feature:_ {{hl.queryFieldPattern=fieldA,fieldB}} as an alternative to
> {{hl.q=fieldA:one OR fieldB:two}} e.g. if obtaining {{hl.q}} from {{q}} poses
> complexity.
> There's already a TODO comment present in the code regarding this:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/releases/lucene-solr/8.11.1/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/highlight/UnifiedSolrHighlighter.java#L418
> {code}
> // TODO define hl.queryFieldPattern as a more advanced alternative to
> hl.requireFieldMatch.
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
