[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17496818#comment-17496818
]
Kevin Risden commented on SOLR-16048:
-------------------------------------
I threw together a quick PR for this. https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/693
As far as I can tell jaxb dependencies are needed in jdk11 since they were
removed. I excluded jakarta.annotation-api since shouldn't be needed. I added
exclusions for the other jakarta items in the list and unit-api.
> Examine Tika dependencies that brought in javax classes
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-16048
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16048
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: contrib - Solr Cell (Tika extraction)
> Reporter: Kevin Risden
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> SOLR-15989 Tika 1.28.1 upgrade brought in some javax packaged classes which
> [~janhoy] caught with the smoketester. Details from [~janhoy] in SOLR-15989:
> {quote}This upgrade adds many parsers and dependencies. I ran the
> smoketester, which introspects every jar looking for illegal "java.{*}" and
> "javax.{*}" class files. These libararies were flagged by the smoke tester:
> {code:java}
> modules/extraction/lib/unit-api-1.0.jar" contains sheisty class
> "javax/measure/Dimension.class"
> modules/extraction/lib/jakarta.activation-1.2.2.jar" contains sheisty class
> "javax/activation/CommandInfo$Beans$1.class"
> modules/extraction/lib/jakarta.annotation-api-1.3.5.jar" contains sheisty
> class "javax/annotation/security/PermitAll.class"
> jakarta.xml.bind-api:2.3.3 {code}
> I believes all jakarta libs are OK license wise, but strangely they use the
> javax.xxx namespace instead of jakarta.xxx. The Units API (javax.measure.xxx)
> seems to be in the same category, that it is a JSR implemented with an
> allowed license.
> We have excluded several annotation jars elsewhere, that's why I raise this
> here.
> I assume the correct action is to make exceptions for these pacakges in the
> smoke tester. Any other insight?{quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
