[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17479721#comment-17479721
 ] 

Cassandra Targett commented on SOLR-15926:
------------------------------------------

You know [~houston], we could leave this for now and fix it via Antora. Since 
the version is a core attribute of every document, it's accessible internally 
during build time as an inherent attribute 
(https://docs.antora.org/antora/latest/page/intrinsic-attributes/#page-attributes).

I was trying to parse the version from the branch name, but Jenkins doesn't 
like it so we need to explicitly define the version, which is done in the 
branch now: 
https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/jira/solr-15556-antora/solr/solr-ref-guide/antora.yml#L6.
 I tested it with one attribute and it works fine - WDYT?

> Fix version specification in the Solr Ref Guide
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-15926
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15926
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: documentation
>    Affects Versions: 9.0
>            Reporter: Houston Putman
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 9.0
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently many places use the docs version (major.minor) with .0 added to the 
> end, when we can easily just use the full solr version instead.
> There are also instances where the Solr version is used for the lucene 
> version. This needs to be updated now that the two cannot be conflated.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to