[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17415265#comment-17415265
]
Mike Drob commented on SOLR-6910:
---------------------------------
The claim is made in the PR that "Using delete-by-query is a workaround but is
much less performant." which sounds specious to me. Would love to see
substantiation of this, because my intuition would have led me the other way.
> deleteById without _route_ param for implicit router could be broadcast
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6910
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6910
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 1h 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> A deleteById request without __route__ param for implicit router could be
> sent to all shard leaders (Shalin). Alternatively, a new router (or a strict
> mode for implicit router) that requires _route_ to be set for all
> adds/deletes (Yonik).
> Some discussion here in SOLR-5890:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5890?focusedCommentId=14236722&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14236722
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5890?focusedCommentId=14264525&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14264525
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
