alessandrobenedetti commented on a change in pull request #129:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/129#discussion_r644688429
##########
File path: solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/parser/SolrQueryParserBase.java
##########
@@ -1149,18 +1151,21 @@ protected Query getFieldQuery(String field,
List<String> queryTerms, boolean raw
return newFieldQuery
(getAnalyzer(), field, queryText, false,
fieldAutoGenPhraseQueries, fieldEnableGraphQueries, synonymQueryStyle);
} else {
- if (raw) {
+ if (raw) {// assumption: raw = false only when called from
ExtendedDismaxQueryParser.getQuery()
return new RawQuery(sf, queryTerms);
} else {
if (queryTerms.size() == 1) {
return ft.getFieldQuery(parser, sf, queryTerms.get(0));
+ } else if(ft instanceof StrField){
Review comment:
Should we then start a much more complex task i.e. "removal of StrField"
to avoid such inconsistencies?
We could try doing it in a back-compatible way, but ultimately I think the
real issue is that we express text to be untokenized in the index in two ways
with no apparent benefit but just inconsistencies ?
i.e.
StrField could be an alias rather than a separate Field Type
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
