[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17340684#comment-17340684 ]
Tobias Kässmann commented on SOLR-12697: ---------------------------------------- Hello [~erickerickson] and [~slivotov], we're now also in the situation that we don't want to switch all fields to stored, to use them in our LTR feature calculation. Do you need here any assistance / further work on this patch? We can block some time to out on this. If the current solution is not that fast, maybe we can use a method like the one from the [CollapseQParser.getTopFieldCacheReader|https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/CollapsingQParserPlugin.java#L476] to get the values?! > pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-12697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: contrib - LTR > Reporter: Stanislav Livotov > Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch, > SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch > > > [~slivotov] wrote in SOLR-12688: > bq. ... FieldValueFeature doesn't support pure DocValues fields (Stored > false). Please also note that for fields which are both stored and DocValues > it is working not optimal because it is extracting just one field from the > stored document. DocValues are obviously faster for such usecases. ... > (Please see SOLR-12688 description for overall context and analysis results.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org