[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17329217#comment-17329217
]
Mike Drob commented on SOLR-15146:
----------------------------------
[~ilan] - I ran git bisect and identified the latest commit here as causing
reproducible test failures - {{gradlew :solr:solrj:test --tests
"org.apache.solr.client.solrj.io.stream.StreamDecoratorTest.testParallelPriorityStream"
-Ptests.seed=EE5064C65877E0F8}} - can you please take a look?
> Distribute Collection API command execution
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-15146
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15146
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: SolrCloud
> Affects Versions: main (9.0)
> Reporter: Ilan Ginzburg
> Assignee: Ilan Ginzburg
> Priority: Major
> Labels: collection-api, overseer
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Building on the distributed cluster state update changes (SOLR-14928), this
> ticket will distribute the Collection API so that commands can execute on any
> node (i.e. the node handling the request through {{CollectionsHandler}})
> without having to go through a Zookeeper queue and the Overseer.
> This is the second step (first was SOLR-14928) after which the Overseer
> could be removed (but the code keeps existing execution options so completion
> by no means Overseer is gone, but it could be removed in a future release).
> -There is a dependency on the distributed cluster state changes because the
> Overseer locking protecting same collection (or same shard) Collection API
> commands from executing concurrently will be replaced by optimistic locking
> of the collection {{state.json}} znodes (or other znodes that will eventually
> replace/augment {{state.json}}).-
> The goal of this ticket is threefold:
> * Simplify the code (running synchronously and not going through the
> Zookeeper queues and the Overseer dequeue logic is much simpler),
> * Lead to improved performance for most/all use cases (although this is a
> secondary goal, as long as performance is not degraded) and
> * Allow a future change (in another future Jira) to the way cluster state is
> cached on the nodes of the cluster (keep less information, be less dependent
> on Zookeeper watches, do not care about collections not present on the node).
> This future work will aim to significantly increase the scale (amount of
> collections) supported by SolrCloud.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
