alamb commented on code in PR #513: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/513#discussion_r2266822246
########## proposals/README.md: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +# Proposals + +## Requirements + +See the [requirements document](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qGDnOyoNyPvcN4FCRhbZGAvp0SfewlWo-WVsai5IKUo/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.v4emiipkghrx) (Note: this doc would become a markdown page in the repo) + +## Proposal lifecycle + +Discuss -> Draft -> POC -> Approved -> Implementation -> Release Review Comment: I suggest reducing the number of stages here to make the process seem less daunting and more accurately describe the community aspect I also think this is not quite how I have seen the current proposals work. Specifically, I suggest *NOT* saying the PMC has a gatekeeping role for deciding if the community can try to implement proposals -- as this doesn't reflect my experience. Instead I think the the PMC should keep the formal gatekeeping activity restricted to the final approved modification to the spec. This will reduce the administrative burden on both proposals and the PMC. ```suggestion Discuss -> Draft / POC -> Implementations -> Approval ``` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
