alamb commented on PR #221: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/221#issuecomment-3140866390
> So the only option would be to completely replace the ordering introduced in this PR with another ordering which includes this nan_count behavior. But then we go back to my original complaint, as the older engines don't support this new ordering: In my opinion this situation would be better than the current state of affairs. I also don't see the proposals as mutually exclusive (though the current proposal could be improved) Is there a formal proposal (aka a PR with proposed wording) for the alternative NAN handling? @orlp are you willing to to make such a proposal if it doesn't exist? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
