[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-13611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18015949#comment-18015949
]
Gargi Jaiswal commented on HDDS-13611:
--------------------------------------
Created this after discussion with [~elavarasan] .
> [DiskBalancer] Inconsistent VolumeDataDensity calculations between SCM and DN
> and incorrect EstBytesToMove
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDDS-13611
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-13611
> Project: Apache Ozone
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Gargi Jaiswal
> Assignee: Gargi Jaiswal
> Priority: Major
>
> This ticket fixes inconsistencies in *VolumeDataDensity* calculations between
> *SCM* and *DN* causing misleading reports.
> # Although *volumeDataDensity* for the datanode is *0.0* still it is started
> and showing containers moved.
> # *Estimated bytes moved and estimated time left* is 0 although it is moving
> containers.
> *Proposed Solution:*
> _VolumeDataDensity calculation (on SCM side in_ {{_*DiskBalancerManager*_}}
> {_}), EstimatedBytesToMove calculation should be aligned with
> DefaultVolumeChoosingPolicy calculation.{_}{*}{*}
> VolumeDataDensity calculation should be done on the DN side so that it
> considers all the ongoing operations and then correctly report it to the SCM.
> And this VolumeDataDensity calculation should be *standAlone utility on
> datanode side that can calculate VolumeDataDensity regardless of diskbalancer
> state (stopped or running)* .
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
