[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-13611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Gargi Jaiswal updated HDDS-13611:
---------------------------------
    Description: 
This ticket fixes inconsistencies in *VolumeDataDensity* calculations between 
*SCM* and *DN* 
 # Although *volumeDataDensity* for the datanode is *0.0* still it is started 
and showing containers moved.
 # *Estimated bytes moved and estimated time left* is 0 although it is moving 
containers. 

*Proposed Solution:*

VolumeDataDensity calculation should be done on the DN side so that it 
considers all the ongoing operations and then correctly report it to the SCM.
And this VolumeDataDensity calculation should be *standAlone utility on 
datanode side that can calculate VolumeDataDensity regardless of diskbalancer 
state (stopped or running)* .

  was:
This ticket fixes inconsistencies in *VolumeDataDensity* calculations between 
*SCM* and *DN* 
 # Although *volumeDataDensity* for the datanode is *0.0* still it is started 
and showing containers moved.
 # *Estimated bytes moved and estimated time left* is 0 although it is moving 
containers. 

*Proposed Solution:*
*VolumeDataDensity* calculation should be done on the DN side so that it 
considers all the ongoing operations and then correctly report it to the SCM.
And this VolumeDataDensity calculation should be *standAlone utility on 
datanode side that can calculate VolumeDataDensity regardless of diskbalancer 
state (stopped or running)* .


> [DiskBalancer] Inconsistent VolumeDataDensity calculations between SCM and DN 
> causing misleading reports and incorrect EstBytesToMove
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-13611
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-13611
>             Project: Apache Ozone
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Gargi Jaiswal
>            Assignee: Gargi Jaiswal
>            Priority: Major
>
> This ticket fixes inconsistencies in *VolumeDataDensity* calculations between 
> *SCM* and *DN* 
>  # Although *volumeDataDensity* for the datanode is *0.0* still it is started 
> and showing containers moved.
>  # *Estimated bytes moved and estimated time left* is 0 although it is moving 
> containers. 
> *Proposed Solution:*
> VolumeDataDensity calculation should be done on the DN side so that it 
> considers all the ongoing operations and then correctly report it to the SCM.
> And this VolumeDataDensity calculation should be *standAlone utility on 
> datanode side that can calculate VolumeDataDensity regardless of diskbalancer 
> state (stopped or running)* .



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to