[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-13032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated HDDS-13032:
----------------------------------
    Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Support proper S3OwnerId representation in Ozone
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-13032
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-13032
>             Project: Apache Ozone
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: s3gateway
>            Reporter: Hsu Han Wen
>            Assignee: Hsu Han Wen
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> This issue is a follow-up from the discussion in [GitHub PR 
> #8315|https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/8315#discussion_r2055076240], 
> specifically regarding how {{S3OwnerId}} is currently represented in s3g.
> At the moment, {{S3OwnerId}} is set to the volume owner's username. However, 
> according to the [AWS account identifier 
> documentation|https://docs.aws.amazon.com/accounts/latest/reference/manage-acct-identifiers.html],
>  the {{OwnerId}} in S3 should be a unique, 64-character identifier that 
> represents the AWS account—not a human-readable name. This misalignment may 
> lead to incompatibilities with S3 clients or services expecting a 
> standardized ID format.
> We should:
>  * Refactor the logic to support proper {{S3OwnerId}} generation and 
> representation.
>  * Review other usages of {{S3Owner}} in the codebase to ensure consistency 
> with expected S3 behavior.
> A similar issue has been addressed in MinIO, which can serve as a reference:
> [https://github.com/minio/minio/issues/4553]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@ozone.apache.org

Reply via email to