adoroszlai commented on PR #7729:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/7729#issuecomment-2610032600

   Thanks @apotheque for the patch.
   
   > I didn’t even know that the ozonefs-hadoop3-client is intended for Spark
   
   `ozonefs-hadoop3-client` is intended for anything that uses 
`hadoop-client-runtime`, one example is Spark.  `shadedPattern` is not specific 
to Spark, but Hadoop.  So I don't think Spark should be included in the 
artifact name.
   
   On the other hand, the prefix `io.trino.hadoop.\$internal` is specific to 
Trino.
   
   > I don’t see a reason to add a separate module just to change one shading 
rule.
   
   I think it depends.
   
   - If Ozone release is to include the Trino-specific jar, either a separate 
module or a change in the build process is necessary.  Separate module seems to 
be less intrusive of the two.
   - If it's enough to let adventurous Ozone users locally build their own jar 
for Trino, then this PR may be a good solution.
   
   Merging this PR still allows working towards a separate module later.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to