[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16609581#comment-16609581
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3425:
--------------------------------------

Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2986#discussion_r216411646
  
    --- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-cassandra-bundle/nifi-cassandra-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/cassandra/PutCassandraQL.java
 ---
    @@ -399,11 +434,13 @@ protected void setStatementObject(final 
BoundStatement statement, final int para
         @OnUnscheduled
         public void stop() {
             super.stop();
    +        statementCache.clear();
         }
     
         @OnShutdown
         public void shutdown() {
             super.stop();
    +        statementCache.clear();
    --- End diff --
    
    Given that we're calling this when the processor is stopped, I don't think 
there's a need for it here.


> Cache prepared statements in PutCassandraQL
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-3425
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3425
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Matt Burgess
>            Assignee: Matt Burgess
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: NIFI-3425.patch
>
>
> Currently PutCassandraQL supports prepared statements (using ? parameters 
> much like JDBC SQL statements) via flow file attributes specifying the type 
> and value of the parameters.
> However, the prepared statement is created (and thus possibly re-created) for 
> each flow file, which neuters its effectiveness over literal CQL statements. 
> The driver warns of this:
> 2017-01-31 14:30:54,287 WARN [cluster1-worker-1] 
> com.datastax.driver.core.Cluster Re-preparing already prepared query insert 
> into test_table (id, timestamp, id1, timestamp1, id
> 2, timestamp2, id3, timestamp3, id4, timestamp4, id5, timestamp5, id6, 
> timestamp6) values (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?);. Please note 
> that preparing the same query
>  more than once is generally an anti-pattern and will likely affect 
> performance. Consider preparing the statement only once.
> Prepared statements should be cached and reused where possible.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to