[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16336458#comment-16336458
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4809:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user pvillard31 opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2430

    NIFI-4809 - Implement a SiteToSiteMetricsReportingTask

    To avoid some code duplication, I moved few utilitary classes into the 
reporting-utils package. And I also added two metrics (available cores and load 
average) as we have in System Diagnostic but that we don't send with the 
current Ambari reporting task.
    
    Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
    
    In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
    to ensure the following steps have been taken:
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [ ] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
         in the commit message?
    
    - [ ] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number 
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
    
    - [ ] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?
    
    - [ ] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn 
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
    - [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
    - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main 
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to 
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered?
    
    ### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/pvillard31/nifi NIFI-4809

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2430.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2430
    
----
commit c49dd0e9ef08b34f30939b2771cd43bf580dc5d4
Author: Pierre Villard <pierre.villard.fr@...>
Date:   2018-01-23T22:15:18Z

    NIFI-4809 - Implement a SiteToSiteMetricsReportingTask

----


> Implement a SiteToSiteMetricsReportingTask
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-4809
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4809
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Extensions
>            Reporter: Pierre Villard
>            Assignee: Pierre Villard
>            Priority: Major
>
> At the moment there is an AmbariReportingTask to send the NiFi-related 
> metrics of the host to the Ambari Metrics Service. In a multi-cluster 
> configuration, or when working with MiNiFi (Java) agents, it might not be 
> possible for all the NiFi instances (NiFi and/or MiNiFi) to access the AMS 
> REST API.
> To solve this problem, a solution would be to implement a 
> SiteToSiteMetricsReportingTask to send the data via S2S to the "main" NiFi 
> instance/cluster that will be able to publish the metrics into AMS (using 
> InvokeHTTP). This way, it is possible to have the metrics of all the 
> instances exposed in one AMS instance.
> I propose to send the data formatted as we are doing right now in the Ambari 
> reporting task. If needed, it can be easily converted into another schema 
> using the record processors once received via S2S.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to