[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16320390#comment-16320390
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4763:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2393

    NIFI-4763: Ignore differences in components' Bundle Version when comp…

    …aring a local flow to a flow in the registry
    
    Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
    
    In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
    to ensure the following steps have been taken:
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [ ] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
         in the commit message?
    
    - [ ] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number 
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
    
    - [ ] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?
    
    - [ ] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn 
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
    - [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
    - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main 
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to 
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered?
    
    ### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/markap14/nifi NIFI-4763

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2393.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2393
    
----
commit 895163799df09e6ceffbd0bbee4398e638969135
Author: Mark Payne <markap14@...>
Date:   2018-01-10T15:01:27Z

    NIFI-4763: Ignore differences in components' Bundle Version when comparing 
a local flow to a flow in the registry

----


> Versioned Flows show as dirty when component versions change
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-4763
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4763
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0
>            Reporter: Bryan Bende
>            Assignee: Mark Payne
>            Priority: Minor
>
> While testing the 1.5.0 RC I happened to have an existing NiFi instance that 
> was running the 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT version of the flow versioning PR, and had a 
> bunch of example versioned flows. I upgraded this instance by replacing the 
> lib directory with everything from the 1.5.0 RC.
> When I went to the UI I noticed all the versioned PGs were showing local 
> changes. Looking at one of them it was because the local flow had upgraded 
> all the component versions to 1.5.0, but the last version of that flow in the 
> registry had the components at 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.
> At this point you can try to rollback the local changes, but it can't really 
> rollback because there are no more processors for 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT. You can 
> save a new version of the flow with the new component versions and all is 
> good.
> This won't really be an issue until the next release when folks have already 
> been using 1.5.0 + registry for a while and upgrade to 1.6.0 (or whatever the 
> next release is). We may want to ignore component version differences until 
> sometime in the future when we have an extension registry.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to