[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-14495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17947363#comment-17947363
]
Pierre Villard commented on NIFI-14495:
---------------------------------------
Sorry, I meant UpdateRecord where you could use literal value strategy and use
expression language against the value of your field to update it and make sure
all of your data respect the same pattern. Someone could possibly improve the
PutBigQuery processor to support this approach but given that it could be quite
a bit of work, not sure if that's something that would happen soon.
> The PutBigQuery processor fails to handle timestamp fields provided in string
> format
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-14495
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-14495
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.3.0
> Reporter: Andriy
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2025-04-24-13-42-00-184.png,
> image-2025-04-24-13-43-14-598.png, image-2025-04-24-13-48-09-144.png,
> image-2025-04-24-14-11-06-239.png
>
>
> The PutBigQuery processor fails to handle timestamp fields provided in string
> format. This functionality worked correctly in the processors
> PutBigQueryBatch and PutBigQueryStream.
> *Error Message:*
> {{Wrong object type used with protocol message reflection. Field number: 11,
> field java type: LONG, value type: java.lang.String}}
> *Example of Input:*
> {
> "timestamp": "2025-04-03T03:44:01.234Z"
> },
> {
> "timestamp": "2025-04-11 10:07:31.072000"
> }
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
