[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17876811#comment-17876811
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on NIFI-13670:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit 7945234f5a7e2eb7a7214ac893c0bbce14cb69c8 in nifi's branch
refs/heads/main from Matt Gilman
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;h=7945234f5a ]
NIFI-13670: Improve sensitive value editing. (#9191)
* NIFI-13670: Improve sensitive value editing.
- Do not present the user with the masked value.
- Do not use the masked value when determining if a value has changed.
- Do not include the masked value in the payload if the value hasn't changed.
- Updates to ParameterItem model to more easily track changes.
* NIFI-13670: Not setting valueRemoved when deleting a parameter.
* NIFI-13670: Marking field as dirty following removal of sensitive value set
text.
> UI - Improve sensitive value editing
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-13670
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13670
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Core UI
> Reporter: Matt Gilman
> Assignee: Matt Gilman
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Sensitive values (properties and parameters) returned by the REST API are
> masked. Currently, there is an issue when editing a sensitive Parameter where
> the value may incorrectly be assigned to the masked value when only the
> description is modified.
> We should further improve the UX when working with sensitive Properties and
> Parameters. We should not present the user with the masked the value to
> prevent inadvertently setting the value to the mask value. Additionally we
> should not prevent the user from setting the value to the actual mask value.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
