[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17867439#comment-17867439
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on NIFI-13565:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit f50fce5344d53d75eb4d0711c6305ca16a999f49 in nifi's branch
refs/heads/main from dan-s1
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;h=f50fce5344 ]
NIFI-13565 Updated Record Date Time Properties to mention DateTimeFormatter
This closes #9096
Signed-off-by: David Handermann <[email protected]>
> Wording in org.apache.nifi.serialization.DateTimeUtils for DATE_FORMAT,
> TIME_FORMAT and TIMESTAMP_FORMAT should be reworded
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-13565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13565
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Daniel Stieglitz
> Assignee: Daniel Stieglitz
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently the wording for DATE_FORMAT, TIME_FORMAT and TIMESTAMP_FORMAT in
> {code:java}
> org.apache.nifi.serialization.DateTimeUtils
> {code}
> reference Simple Date Format when in fact the underlying logic uses
> {code:java}
> java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter
> {code}
> and not
> {code:java}
> java.text.SimpleDataFormat
> {code}
> and as seen in NIFI-13557 there are subtitles between these two classes.
> The wording in DATE_FORMAT and TIME_FORMAT should be reworded to indicate
> these use DateTimeFormatter formats.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
