issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Upgrade jdependency to 2.14 [maven-shade-plugin] via GitHub
• [I] Verify stage caches an empty directory for the main JAR [maven-build-cache-extension] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Verify stage caches an empty directory for the main JAR [maven-build-cache-extension] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Verify stage caches an empty directory for the main JAR [maven-build-cache-extension] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [MNG-7049] Version range resolution downloads all poms, not just the highest version [maven] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [SUREFIRE-2204] Convert logging to slf4j to allow MDC to be printed [maven-surefire] via GitHub
• [PR] Use JUnit5 in failsafe ITs [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use JUnit5 in failsafe ITs [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use JUnit5 in failsafe ITs [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use JUnit5 in failsafe ITs [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use JUnit5 in failsafe ITs [maven-surefire] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [MDEP-592] Regression: -Dmdep.addParentPoms=true causes <repositories> to be ignored [maven-dependency-plugin] via GitHub
• Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update site's logo with the new Oak Leaf ASF logo [maven-site] via GitHub
• [PR] Non-serializable classes don't need serialVersionUID [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Non-serializable classes don't need serialVersionUID [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove Cloneable [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove Cloneable [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize artifact lookup in DefaultProjectDependencyAnalyzer [maven-dependency-analyzer] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize artifact lookup in DefaultProjectDependencyAnalyzer [maven-dependency-analyzer] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement missing tests and cleanup TODOs in DependencyVisitorTest [maven-dependency-analyzer] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement missing tests and cleanup TODOs in DependencyVisitorTest [maven-dependency-analyzer] via GitHub
• [I] Dependency update [maven-release] via GitHub
• [PR] Better checksum control [maven-resolver] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Better checksum control [maven-resolver] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Better checksum control [maven-resolver] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Better checksum control [maven-resolver] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Better checksum control [maven-resolver] via GitHub
• [I] Maven/Nexus deploy fails or leaves unresolved property variables in POM [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Maven/Nexus deploy fails or leaves unresolved property variables in POM [maven] via GitHub
• [I] release:prepare truncates Git URL when pushing the tag [maven-release] via GitHub
• [PR] Bump org.apache.maven.shared:maven-dependency-analyzer from 1.16.0 to 1.17.0 [maven-dependency-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.maven.shared:maven-dependency-analyzer from 1.16.0 to 1.17.0 [maven-dependency-plugin] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove unused dependency [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
• [I] SurefireReportTest is using legacy resolver, not using user settings.xml and downloading artifacts [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SurefireReportTest is using legacy resolver, not using user settings.xml and downloading artifacts [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SurefireReportTest is using legacy resolver, not using user settings.xml and downloading artifacts [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SurefireReportTest is using legacy resolver, not using user settings.xml and downloading artifacts [maven-surefire] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Compatibility with Jupiter 6.0.0+ [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Compatibility with Jupiter 6.0.0+ [maven-surefire] via GitHub
• [I] DiagnosticListener summary message is obscur and misleading [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] DiagnosticListener summary message is obscur and misleading [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] DiagnosticListener summary message is obscur and misleading [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
• [PR] Update latest release m-compiler-p, m-dependency-analyzer [maven-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update latest release m-compiler-p, m-dependency-analyzer [maven-site] via GitHub
• [PR] Bump org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin from 3.14.1 to 3.15.0 [maven-apache-parent] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin from 3.14.1 to 3.15.0 [maven-apache-parent] via GitHub
• [PR] Bump com.palantir.javaformat:palantir-java-format from 2.85.0 to 2.86.0 [maven-parent] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump com.palantir.javaformat:palantir-java-format from 2.85.0 to 2.86.0 [maven-parent] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Deprecate StringUtils.concatenate [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• [PR] Bump net.sourceforge.pmd:pmd-core from 7.20.0 to 7.21.0 [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump net.sourceforge.pmd:pmd-core from 7.20.0 to 7.21.0 [maven] via GitHub
  • [PR] Bump net.sourceforge.pmd:pmd-core from 7.20.0 to 7.21.0 [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump net.sourceforge.pmd:pmd-core from 7.20.0 to 7.21.0 [maven] via GitHub
• [PR] Bump ch.qos.logback:logback-classic from 1.5.26 to 1.5.27 [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump ch.qos.logback:logback-classic from 1.5.26 to 1.5.27 [maven] via GitHub
  • [PR] Bump ch.qos.logback:logback-classic from 1.5.26 to 1.5.27 [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump ch.qos.logback:logback-classic from 1.5.26 to 1.5.27 [maven] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [MWRAPPER-122] Mingw paths problem on Windows [maven-wrapper] via GitHub
• [PR] try to make compiler summary message usable [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixes #1028, try to make compiler summary message usableinstead of obscur aggregates [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix wrong resources directory name in MavenProject [maven-plugin-testing] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix wrong resources directory name in MavenProject [maven-plugin-testing] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix wrong resources directory name in MavenProject [maven-plugin-testing] via GitHub
• [I] Support Maven version range activation for profiles [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support Maven version range activation for profiles [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support Maven version range activation for profiles [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support Maven version range activation for profiles [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support Maven version range activation for profiles [maven] via GitHub
• [I] Maven 4 rejects valid XML POM when namespace uses HTTPS [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Maven 4 rejects POM when xmlns:xsi uses HTTPS [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Maven 4 rejects POM when xmlns:xsi uses HTTPS [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Maven 4 rejects POM when xmlns:xsi uses HTTPS [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Maven 4 rejects POM when xmlns:xsi uses HTTPS [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Maven 4 rejects POM when xmlns:xsi uses HTTPS [maven] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Bump org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-testing from 2.0.2 to 2.1.0 [maven-doxia] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-testing from 2.0.2 to 2.1.0 [maven-doxia] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: fix broken reference links [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: fix broken reference links [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: fix broken reference links [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: fix broken reference links [maven] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: Migrate to JSpecify from jsr305 [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Migrate to JSpecify from jsr305 [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove jsr305 based javax.annotation annotations [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove jsr305 based javax.annotation annotations [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• [I] Deprecate replacew and contains methods [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [MSHARED-965] Add fill-method to MessageBuilder [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [MSHARED-965] Add fill-method to MessageBuilder [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• [PR] Deprecate StringUtils.concatenate in favor of JDK String.join [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate StringUtils.concatenate in favor of JDK String.join [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate StringUtils.concatenate in favor of JDK String.join [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate StringUtils.concatenate in favor of JDK String.join [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate StringUtils.concatenate in favor of JDK String.join [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• [PR] Follow Oracle Javadoc conventions [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Follow Oracle Javadoc conventions [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Follow Oracle Javadoc conventions [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Deprecate StringUtils.clean [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [core] deprecate StringUtils.clean() in favor of StringUtils.trim() [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• [PR] Convert tests to JUnit 5 [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert tests to JUnit 5 [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert tests to JUnit 5 [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• [PR] Move SLF4J artifacts to boot classloader [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move SLF4J artifacts to boot classloader [maven] via GitHub
• [PR] Add Javadoc for deprecated Artifact constants [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Javadoc for deprecated Artifact constants [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Javadoc for deprecated Artifact constants [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Javadoc for deprecated Artifact constants [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Javadoc for deprecated Artifact constants [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Javadoc for deprecated Artifact constants [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Javadoc for deprecated Artifact constants [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Javadoc for deprecated Artifact constants [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Javadoc for deprecated Artifact constants [maven] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Please add common parent POMs that are applicable to general use cases [maven-site] via GitHub
• [PR] core [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove another unused test scope dependency [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
• [I] Align configuration properties [maven-resolver] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Align configuration properties [maven-resolver] via GitHub
• [I] Better checksum control [maven-resolver] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages