arup-chauhan commented on PR #15708: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/15708#issuecomment-3943093798
Hey @mccullocht @benwtrent Thanks, this is super helpful context. I agree, the recall gains from increasing query bits alone may taper quickly, and that cross-bit-rate comparisons can get expensive/packing-dependent. In this PR, I only added metadata/API plumbing (no scoring behavior change yet), but your points are exactly the risks for follow-up use. I’m happy to keep this scoped as incremental plumbing and treat any query-bit-aware scoring work as a follow-up with some working evidence (benchmarks/recall + complexity tradeoffs), potentially behind internal strategy decisions, so users don’t need to tune low-level parameters directly. The minSimilarity-based early-elimination idea sounds very promising. Looking forward to the issue. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
