curious wrote: > > if the architect OWNS that building.. yes he has the right to blow it up.. > Perhaps. But the argument was that the program in question was work-for-hire. Which means the hirer owned it - not Microsoft. And thus, the hirer was the one with the right to 'blow it up'. Jenn V. -- Humans are the only species to feed and house entirely separate species for no reason other than the pleasure of their company. Why? [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jenn Vesperman http://www.simegen.com/~jenn/ ************ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling) J B
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ rulin... Jamie Walker
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ rulin... Deirdre Saoirse
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ rulin... Emily Ratliff
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ rulin... Caitlyn Martin
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ rulin... J B
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ r... Caitlyn Martin
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ r... Jamie Walker
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ rulin... J B
- Re: micros~1 and apple (was Re: [issues] MS/DOJ rulin... J B