[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-2671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17561794#comment-17561794
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on KUDU-2671:
-------------------------------------------------------

Commit 75045fa10619c5674ca9b6405332be97e43bfeba in kudu's branch 
refs/heads/master from Alexey Serbin
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=kudu.git;h=75045fa10 ]

KUDU-2671 fix handling hash dimensions in ADD_RANGE_PARTITION

This patch fixes a bug in handling hash dimensions when storing the
information on HashSchema for a newly added range in the system catalog.
I modfied one already existing test scenario in MasterTest to spot
regressions, verifying that before the fix the updated scenario
would fail as expected.

This is a follow-up to 6909ee4f800da192b72e59680916e5004527b6db.

Change-Id: If1fed52f9abd02a8aa2bc85f2692252d16965621
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/18695
Reviewed-by: Attila Bukor <abu...@apache.org>
Tested-by: Alexey Serbin <ale...@apache.org>


> Change hash number for range partitioning
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KUDU-2671
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-2671
>             Project: Kudu
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: client, java, master, server
>    Affects Versions: 1.8.0
>            Reporter: yangz
>            Assignee: Mahesh Reddy
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: feature, roadmap-candidate, scalability
>         Attachments: 屏幕快照 2019-01-24 下午12.03.41.png
>
>
> For our usage, the kudu schema design isn't flexible enough.
> We create our table for day range such as dt='20181112' as hive table.
> But our data size change a lot every day, for one day it will be 50G, but for 
> some other day it will be 500G. For this case, it be hard to set the hash 
> schema. If too big, for most case, it will be too wasteful. But too small, 
> there is a performance problem in the case of a large amount of data.
>  
> So we suggest a solution we can change the hash number by the history data of 
> a table.
> for example
>  # we create schema with one estimated value.
>  # we collect the data size by day range
>  # we create new day range partition by our collected day size.
> We use this feature for half a year, and it work well. We hope this feature 
> will be useful for the community. Maybe the solution isn't so complete. 
> Please help us make it better.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to