[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-2126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Todd Lipcon updated KUDU-2126:
------------------------------
    Labels: newbie  (was: )

> DeleteTablet RPC on an already deleted tablet should be a no-op
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KUDU-2126
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-2126
>             Project: Kudu
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tserver
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0
>            Reporter: Adar Dembo
>              Labels: newbie
>
> This is remaining (but lower priority) work from KUDU-2114:
> bq. When observed on a live cluster, it was further observed that the tablet 
> deletion requests were rather expensive. It appears that a DeleteTablet RPC 
> on a tombstone is not a no-op; it always flushes the superblock twice, which 
> generates two fsyncs. This should also be addressed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to