[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16905889#comment-16905889
 ] 

Aleksey Plekhanov edited comment on IGNITE-9410 at 8/13/19 7:38 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------

The patch is ready, it includes server implementation and java client 
implementation to support transactions.

[~isapego], there is thin client protocol change in the patch (we discussed it 
on dev list with you). Could you please review the patch?


was (Author: alex_pl):
The patch is ready. 

[~isapego], there is thin client protocol change in the patch (we discussed it 
on dev list with you). Could you please review the patch?

> MVCC: add support to thin clients
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-9410
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9410
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: mvcc, thin client
>            Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov
>            Assignee: Aleksey Plekhanov
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: iep-34
>             Fix For: 2.8
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently only ODBC and JDBC drivers support transactions and in not very 
> efficient way. We need to add transactional API to .NET, Java, CPP, NodeJS 
> and Python clients.
> Key pieces:
> # Add API to relevant clients
> # Review listener logic - currently we create separate threads. But is it 
> really needed? 
> ## If there is an implicit operation and no ongoing transaction, then 
> operation might be executed right away
> ## If cache operations are decoupled from threads, then we can resort to 
> reactive approach, when multiple transactions could be executed from the same 
> thread



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

Reply via email to