Ilya Kasnacheev created IGNITE-8700:
---------------------------------------

             Summary: Support Uid/Pwd fields for authentication in DSN 
connection strings
                 Key: IGNITE-8700
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8700
             Project: Ignite
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: odbc
    Affects Versions: 2.5
            Reporter: Ilya Kasnacheev
            Assignee: Igor Sapego


I think Ignite should support *Uid* connection string field in addition to 
existing *User*, and *Pwd* in addition to *Password*. They should be 
interchangeable. This will improve user experience of tool users trying our 
ODBC.

I have reviewed several ODBC implementation for popular data bases WRT 
authentication.

[Microsoft SQL 
Server|https://www.connectionstrings.com/microsoft-sql-server-odbc-driver/] 
uses *Uid* for username and *Pwd* for password

[Oracle|https://www.connectionstrings.com/oracle/] seems to prefer *User Id* 
and *Password* but also supports *Uid* and *Pwd*.

[IBM DB2|https://www.connectionstrings.com/ibm-db2/] uses *UID* and *PWD*.

[MySQL seems to 
prefer|https://dev.mysql.com/doc/connector-odbc/en/connector-odbc-configuration-connection-without-dsn.html]
 User and Password, but [seems to also 
accept|https://www.connectionstrings.com/mysql/] *Uid* and *Pwd*.

[PostgreSQL|https://www.connectionstrings.com/postgresql-odbc-driver-psqlodbc/] 
uses *Uid* and *Pwd*.

In short, everybody seems to support *Uid* and *Pwd* even if they have their 
own field names. Many tools (such as Informatica) rely on this convention, 
translating GUI inputs into *Uid* and *Pwd* connection parameters.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to