[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16328646#comment-16328646
 ] 

Pavel Kuznetsov edited comment on IGNITE-6217 at 1/18/18 9:26 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

1) Renamed

2) Cleaned up

3) To have more stable results. Since table size affects performance of query 
execution, we want `test` method to be executed with the same table size. 
[~vozerov] , correct me if I'm wrong

4) I don't mind, [~vozerov] , should we remove this?

5) -If I got it right, the most interesting results are native vs thin driver.- 
[~vozerov] -do we need v2 configurations ?- 

Yes we need this

 


was (Author: pkouznet):
1) Renamed

2) Cleaned up

3) To have more stable results. Since table size affects performance of query 
execution, we want `test` method to be executed with the same table size. 
[~vozerov] , correct me if I'm wrong

4) I don't mind, [~vozerov] , should we remove this?

5) If I got it right, the most interesting results are native vs thin driver. 
[~vozerov] do we need v2 configurations ?

> Add benchmark to compare JDBC drivers and native SQL execution
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-6217
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6217
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: jdbc, sql, yardstick
>    Affects Versions: 2.1
>            Reporter: Taras Ledkov
>            Assignee: Pavel Kuznetsov
>            Priority: Major
>
> We have to compare performance of the native SQL execution (via Ignite SQL 
> API), JDBC v2 driver, that uses Ignite client to connect to grid and JDBC 
> thin client.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to