[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15690108#comment-15690108
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-3640:
----------------------------------------
GitHub user tledkov-gridgain opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1268
IGNITE-3640 IGFS: Local secondary: Investigate whether we need
BufferedInputStream for open operation.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-3640
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1268.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #1268
----
commit 7d1e4fb00c5488559d894abe7405003f3562fe92
Author: tledkov-gridgain <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-11-23T13:28:37Z
IGNITE-3640: remove buffer at input stream
----
> IGFS: Local secondary: Investigate whether we need BufferedInputStream for
> open operation.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-3640
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3640
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: IGFS
> Affects Versions: 1.6
> Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov
> Assignee: Taras Ledkov
> Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> We need to accurately investigate IGFS input stream workflow. I have doubts
> we really need to extend from {{BufferedInputStream}} here.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
