[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15682871#comment-15682871
 ] 

Alexander Paschenko commented on IGNITE-2294:
---------------------------------------------

Fixed all comments and failing tests. Waiting for results of post-fix full TC 
run (in progress now).

I suggest that we leave alone {{JdbcQueryTaskV2}} with its UUID as long as this 
UUID is also used in {{JdbcResultSet}}. Currently UUID in old {{JdbcQueryTask}} 
does not seem to make any problems right away, so I think it would be better to 
shift this UUID -> IgniteUuid transition till 2.0 is released - by that time, 
we'll be able to fix all related classes in the right way without worrying 
about breaking anything.

> Implement SQL DML (insert, update, delete) clauses.
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-2294
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Sergi Vladykin
>            Assignee: Alexander Paschenko
>              Labels: important
>             Fix For: 1.8
>
>
> We need to add parsing for all the listed SQL commands and translate them 
> into respective cache operations (putIfAbstent, put, remove).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to