[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-28881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18118034#comment-18118034
]
Evgeny Stanilovsky edited comment on IGNITE-28881 at 9/22/26 2:18 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[~le.louch] JFYI too ^. Seems if comment :
//CorrelatedNestedLoopJoinRule.INSTANCE,
//CorrelateToNestedLoopRule.INSTANCE,
it can\`t be planned any more ... smth change in traits after calcite ver bump
was (Author: zstan):
[~le.louch] JFYI too ^
> Calcite. Plan without exchange under aggregate need to be produced
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-28881
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-28881
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: sql
> Reporter: Evgeny Stanilovsky
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ignite-2, ise
>
> Check [1]. Currently there are present indexes i.e.
> {noformat}
> createTable("TH1", IgniteDistributions.hash(Arrays.asList(0, 1)),
> "A", Integer.class, "B", Integer.class, "C", Integer.class)
> .addIndex("TH1_IDX", 0, 1),
> createTable("TH2", IgniteDistributions.hash(Arrays.asList(1, 2)),
> "A", Integer.class, "B", Integer.class, "C", Integer.class)
> .addIndex("TH2_IDX", 0, 1)
> {noformat}
> this test need to pass also without indexes (i.e. no exchange under aggregate)
> [1]
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.query.calcite.planner.WindowPlannerTest#testCorrelatedDistribution
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
