[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-27700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Aleksey Plekhanov updated IGNITE-27700:
---------------------------------------
    Description: 
Test TpchScale100Test.test[queryId=20] is flaky. For some reason plans are 
differnt between execution. But main problem: filter is not merged into scan. 
See next plan part after {{trimUnusedFields}}:
{noformat}
  LogicalProject(L_QUANTITY=[$2])
    LogicalFilter(condition=[AND(=($0, $cor0.PS_PARTKEY), =($1, 
$cor0.PS_SUPPKEY), >=($3, 1994-01-01), <($3, +(1994-01-01, *(12:INTERVAL YEAR, 
1))))])
      LogicalProject(L_PARTKEY=[$3], L_SUPPKEY=[$4], L_QUANTITY=[$6], 
L_SHIPDATE=[$12])
        IgniteLogicalTableScan(table=[[PUBLIC, LINEITEM]])
{noformat}

Filter can't transpose project ({{CoreRules.FILTER_PROJECT_TRANSPOSE}}), since 
it contains correlates. And part of filter condition can't be merged into scan 
({{FilterScanMergeRule.TABLE_SCAN_SKIP_CORRELATED}}), since project node 
located between filter and scan.

Plans difference should be investigated separately.

  was:
Test TpchScale100Test.test[queryId=20] is flaky. For some reason plans are 
differnt between execution. But main problem: filter is not merged into scan. 
See next plan part after {{trimUnusedFields}}:
{noformat}
                    LogicalProject(L_QUANTITY=[$2])
                      LogicalFilter(condition=[AND(=($0, $cor0.PS_PARTKEY), 
=($1, $cor0.PS_SUPPKEY), >=($3, 1994-01-01), <($3, +(1994-01-01, *(12:INTERVAL 
YEAR, 1))))])
                        LogicalProject(L_PARTKEY=[$3], L_SUPPKEY=[$4], 
L_QUANTITY=[$6], L_SHIPDATE=[$12])
                          IgniteLogicalTableScan(table=[[PUBLIC, LINEITEM]])

{noformat}

Filter can't transpose project ({{CoreRules.FILTER_PROJECT_TRANSPOSE}}), since 
it contains correlates. And part of filter condition can't be merged into scan 
({{FilterScanMergeRule.TABLE_SCAN_SKIP_CORRELATED}}), since project node 
located between filter and scan.

Plans difference should be investigated separately.


> Test TpchScale100Test.test[queryId=20] is flaky
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-27700
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-27700
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Aleksey Plekhanov
>            Assignee: Aleksey Plekhanov
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: calcite, ise
>
> Test TpchScale100Test.test[queryId=20] is flaky. For some reason plans are 
> differnt between execution. But main problem: filter is not merged into scan. 
> See next plan part after {{trimUnusedFields}}:
> {noformat}
>   LogicalProject(L_QUANTITY=[$2])
>     LogicalFilter(condition=[AND(=($0, $cor0.PS_PARTKEY), =($1, 
> $cor0.PS_SUPPKEY), >=($3, 1994-01-01), <($3, +(1994-01-01, *(12:INTERVAL 
> YEAR, 1))))])
>       LogicalProject(L_PARTKEY=[$3], L_SUPPKEY=[$4], L_QUANTITY=[$6], 
> L_SHIPDATE=[$12])
>         IgniteLogicalTableScan(table=[[PUBLIC, LINEITEM]])
> {noformat}
> Filter can't transpose project ({{CoreRules.FILTER_PROJECT_TRANSPOSE}}), 
> since it contains correlates. And part of filter condition can't be merged 
> into scan ({{FilterScanMergeRule.TABLE_SCAN_SKIP_CORRELATED}}), since project 
> node located between filter and scan.
> Plans difference should be investigated separately.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to