[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-26758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18046998#comment-18046998
 ] 

Kirill Anisimov commented on IGNITE-26758:
------------------------------------------

Additionally verified the {*}{{}}{*}{{{}{{SqlQuery}}{}}} execution path.
h4. What was added
 * Reused the same test-only instrumentation 
({{{}executeFieldsQueryHitCount(){}}} / 
{{{}resetExecuteFieldsQueryHitCount(){}}}).

 * Extended {{GridCacheQueryManagerExecuteFieldsQueryTest}} with 
*SqlQuery-specific* coverage:

 ## {{SqlQuery}} with {{setLocal(true)}} on a single node

 ## {{SqlQuery}} with {{setLocal(false)}} on a 2-node grid, with keys selected 
so that entries are primary on different nodes

h4. Result

In all {{SqlQuery}} scenarios the hit counter remains {*}0{*}. Therefore, 
*{{qryResCache}} is not involved* in {{SqlQuery}} execution.

> Figure out what qryResCache is used for and where it is used
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-26758
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-26758
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Kirill Anisimov
>            Assignee: Kirill Anisimov
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: cache, investigation
>             Fix For: 2.18
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> There is a qryResCache module in our codebase, but it is not entirely clear 
> what exactly it caches and what it is intended for. It is necessary to 
> analyze its operation and determine whether it needs to be used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to