[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-24487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Alexander Lapin reassigned IGNITE-24487:
----------------------------------------

    Assignee: Vladislav Pyatkov

> Lock manager's approximate counter may allow taking more locks more than limit
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-24487
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-24487
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Vladislav Pyatkov
>            Assignee: Vladislav Pyatkov
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ignite-3
>
> h3. Motivation
> The integration test (_ItLockTableTest.testTakeMoreLocksThanAfford_) fails 
> due to the issue.
> {noformat}
> org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: Some lockers are missing ==> expected: 
> <true> but was: <false>
>   at 
> app//org.junit.jupiter.api.AssertionFailureBuilder.build(AssertionFailureBuilder.java:151)
>   at 
> app//org.junit.jupiter.api.AssertionFailureBuilder.buildAndThrow(AssertionFailureBuilder.java:132)
>   at app//org.junit.jupiter.api.AssertTrue.failNotTrue(AssertTrue.java:63)
>   at app//org.junit.jupiter.api.AssertTrue.assertTrue(AssertTrue.java:36)
>   at app//org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue(Assertions.java:214)
>   at 
> app//org.apache.ignite.distributed.ItLockTableTest.testTakeMoreLocksThanAfford(ItLockTableTest.java:195)
>   at java.base@17.0.6/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
>   at java.base@17.0.6/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1511)
>   at java.base@17.0.6/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1511)
> {noformat}
> It happens because the lock limit is defined strictly in the test:
> {code}
> total == CACHE_SIZE && lockManager.available() == 0
> {code}
> h3. Definition of done
> Rewrite the test in order for it to wait for more or equal locks than that 
> threshold.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to