[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-24301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17921407#comment-17921407
 ] 

Igor Sapego commented on IGNITE-24301:
--------------------------------------

Make sure to introduce a new protocol feature for this functionality.

> Sql schema. Fix Thin client protocol to use schema names
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-24301
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-24301
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: thin client
>            Reporter: Evgeny Stanilovsky
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ignite-3
>             Fix For: 3.1
>
>
> Table can be unambiguously identified either by id or by pair of schema name 
> and table name.
> So, Thin Client protocol should be aware of schema name a table belongs to.
> ClientTables, *ClientTableGetRequestV2* and *ClientTablesGetRequestV2* should 
> either read/write table canonical name (see `QualifiedName.toCanonicalName`) 
> or transfer schema name with the table name.
> I'd prefer second approach with 2 separate Strings, to avoid excessive 
> parsing and quoting names.
> Check this issue mention after ignite-24033 was merged



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to