[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17907386#comment-17907386
 ] 

 Kirill Sizov commented on IGNITE-23937:
----------------------------------------

[~rpuch] to review and update this task.

> WriteIntentSwitchReplicaRequest handling misses schema sync
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-23937
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23937
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Roman Puchkovskiy
>            Assignee: Roman Puchkovskiy
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ignite-3
>
> In PartitionReplicaListener, when handling WriteIntentSwitchReplicaRequests, 
> we don't do schema sync at the corresponding transaction begin ts, so, when 
> we try to access indices to remove writes from them for an aborting  
> WriteIntentSwitchReplicaRequest, we might see a stale Catalog and fail to get 
> indices for the table if the table is already dropped.
> Apart from fixing this, we should probably also
>  * Make sure that all request types are added to tests in 
> PartitionReplicaListenerTest that verify schema sync
>  * Rearrange the code to make it more difficult to miss application of schema 
> sync when adding a new request type



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to