[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-18070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Aleksandr Polovtcev resolved IGNITE-18070.
------------------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

> Design the process of having a single storage for a follower and a learner on 
> the same node
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-18070
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-18070
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Aleksandr Polovtcev
>            Assignee: Aleksandr Polovtcev
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ignite-3
>
> Secondary Storage consistency is going to be implemented through the Raft 
> Learners. However, there exists a challenge: what if a partition's Primary 
> Storage will be assigned to the same node as its Secondary Storage? This 
> means that both a follower and learner for the same partition will be hosted 
> on a single node with the same consistent ID. Currently JRaft is not able to 
> distinguish two nodes with the same consistent ID. There are two ways to 
> solve this problem:
> # Use {{PeerId#idx}} functionality. This is a built-in JRaft mechanism to 
> have multiple Raft nodes on a single physical nodes.
> # Use a single Raft node that will write into multiple storages. 
> While option 1 is easy and straightforward to implement, this ticket focuses 
> on investigation of the option 2. The second option has a priority because it 
> is potentially more effective: since there will be less Raft nodes, there 
> will be less network traffic. The main problem with this approach is when a 
> learner or a follower hosted on such physical node gets moved to a different 
> physical node (or two nodes get merged into one). We should check if this is 
> technically possible to implement.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to