[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-19818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17738245#comment-17738245
 ] 

Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-19818:
----------------------------------------

{panel:title=Branch: [pull/10804/head] Base: [master] : No blockers 
found!|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#D6F7C1}{panel}
{panel:title=Branch: [pull/10804/head] Base: [master] : New Tests 
(1)|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#D6F7C1}
{color:#00008b}Calcite SQL{color} [[tests 
1|https://ci2.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=7231903]]
* {color:#013220}IgniteCalciteTestSuite: 
ServerStatisticsIntegrationTest.testSizeIntOverflow - PASSED{color}

{panel}
[TeamCity *--> Run :: All* 
Results|https://ci2.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=7231984&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll]

> Calcite engine. Query planning failed when cache size is too big
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-19818
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-19818
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Aleksey Plekhanov
>            Assignee: Aleksey Plekhanov
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ise
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We use cache size as estimation for row count while planning, but use 
> {{cache.size()}} method, that returns int value. But if cache size is more 
> than {{Integer.MAX_VALUE}} we get an wrong size or even negative sometimes, 
> which cause assertion errors during planning.
> We should fix it to {{cache.sizeLong()}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to