[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-18134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mirza Aliev updated IGNITE-18134:
---------------------------------
Epic Link: (was: IGNITE-19577)
> Introduce common auto adjust scheduler
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-18134
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-18134
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Alexander Lapin
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ignite-3
>
> h3. Motivation
> [IGNITE-18121|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-18121] introduced
> DATA_NODES_AUTO_ADJUST_SCALE_UP scheduler and
> [IGNITE-18132|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-18132] SCALE_DOWN
> one. Let's take a look at the last remaining auto adjust property -
> DATA_NODES_AUTO_ADJUST. The reason we have one is to eliminate excessive
> rebalance in case of users intention on having the same value for both
> scale_up and scale_down. As we saw in the example above, the events of adding
> and removing nodes fall into the corresponding frames with a dedicated timer
> each: one for expanding the topology (adding nodes), and another for
> narrowing it (removing nodes), which in turn leads to two rebalances - one
> per each frame. If the user however wants to put both types of events (adding
> and removing nodes) in one frame with only one dataNodes recalculation and
> one rebalance, he should use the DATA_NODES_AUTO_ADJUST property.
> h3. Definition of Done
> DataNodes recalculation transitively triggered by both node appeared and
> disappeared events is delayed for dataNodesAutoAdjust value.
> In case of new logical topology event, existing auto adjust timer should be
> re-scheduled.
> h3. Implementation Notes
> Same as for IGNITE-18121 and IGNITE-18132.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
