[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-18685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Roman Puchkovskiy resolved IGNITE-18685.
----------------------------------------
    Resolution: Invalid

Superseded by IGNITE-18712

> Do not allow a node excluded from Logical Topology to enter Physical Topology 
> again
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-18685
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-18685
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Roman Puchkovskiy
>            Assignee: Roman Puchkovskiy
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ignite-3
>             Fix For: 3.0.0-beta2
>
>
> As per IGNITE-18630, a node excluded from Logical Topology (LT) must be 
> excluded from Physical Topology (PT).
> The following scenario is possible:
>  # A node is a part of both PT and LT
>  # Its network cable gets unplugged, but the node keeps being alive
>  # After proper timeouts, the cluster removes the node from LT (and, hence, 
> PT)
>  # The network cable gets plugged again, so the node attempts to enter the PT 
> with the same old ID (aka Launch ID)
> In such a situation, the node must be refused entry, namely, a connection 
> must be terminated on a handshake attempt. This has to be done both in 
> {{RecoveryServerHandshakeManager}} and {{{}RecoveryClientHandshakeManager{}}}.
> When a node is refused a connection attempt, the refusing node must first 
> send an explaining message (like 'your ID is stale') and then close the 
> physical connection.
> The refused node must take measures to refresh its identity (like initiating 
> a critical failure using a Failure Handler).
> A subtle thing is how we persist the fact that some node ID is stale. For 
> starters, we could make this information volatile (only keep it in memory), 
> but later we could record this information using CMG.
> {*}PS{*}. Please do not confuse this issue with IGNITE-18712 which is a new 
> attempt to solve the same problem. Current issue is stale and is planned to 
> be closed without a fix soon.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to