[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17477229#comment-17477229
]
Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-16024:
----------------------------------------
{panel:title=Branch: [pull/9702/head] Base: [master] : No blockers
found!|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#D6F7C1}{panel}
{panel:title=Branch: [pull/9702/head] Base: [master] : No new tests
found!|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1}{panel}
[TeamCity *--> Run :: All*
Results|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=6371185&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll]
> Add more javadocs to BPlusTree
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-16024
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16024
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: data structures
> Reporter: Ivan Bessonov
> Assignee: Ivan Bessonov
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> During the investigation of
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15990 it became clear that
> BPlusTree class and its relatives lack proper documentation.
> Code of these classes is rather complicated. It's hard to understand the
> structure, algorithms and invariants of the tree.
> I suggest at least documenting the structure of the tree and main operations.
> It would affect classes like BPlusIO, BPlusTree, PageHandler, BPlusTree.Get
> and so on.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
