[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17205838#comment-17205838
]
Marty Jones edited comment on IGNITE-13037 at 10/1/20, 9:36 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
I currently use NCache for our caching provider. They support near caches so I
was hoping to transition to Apache Ignite and not lose any current
functionality.
We gain a huge performance benefit of using a near cache since we only have to
take the performance hit of pulling down the cache item from the remote cache
one time for most of our objects.
was (Author: [email protected]):
I currently use NCache for our caching provider. They support near caches so I
was hoping to transition to Apache Ignite and not lose any current
functionality.
> .NET: Thin Client Near Cache
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-13037
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13037
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: platforms, thin client
> Reporter: Pavel Tupitsyn
> Assignee: Pavel Tupitsyn
> Priority: Major
> Labels: .NET
>
> Add near caching for thin clients:
> * Clients can subscribe to change notifications for specific keys
> * Clients use partition awareness to route subscriptions to primary nodes
> * Use existing Thick .NET Client near caching mechanism to handle updates on
> the server side
> * Eviction policy is to be handled by the client code (because multiple
> servers are involved)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)