[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17193361#comment-17193361
]
Maksim Timonin commented on IGNITE-13204:
-----------------------------------------
[~ptupitsyn]
hi! I've checked tests, most of them are failed due to my change that
connection is lazy (instead of checking it in constructor). Will fix it.
But also there is a test that checks that ClientConfiguration class is
Serializable. Is there any reason to mark this class Serializable, if yes -
should we support backward compatibility with older versions of the class (the
difference is address field, that I replace with function)?
> Java Thin client Kubernetes discovery
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-13204
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13204
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: platforms
> Reporter: Alexandr
> Assignee: Maksim Timonin
> Priority: Major
> Labels: java
> Time Spent: 4h 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Thin clients should be able to discover servers from within Kubernetes pod
> through k8s API, without specifying any IP addresses.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
