[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17108341#comment-17108341
 ] 

Marty Jones commented on IGNITE-7269:
-------------------------------------

For now we are stuck with ASP.NET.   We have a large legacy ASP.NET MVC 
application that we want to use Ignite on.  

Do you know if the overhead of the client of 100-200 MB will be per cache?   I 
know we will need at least 2 caches so trying to judge the overhead needed.

 

> .NET: Thin ASP.NET Session State Store Provider
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-7269
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7269
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: platforms, thin client
>            Reporter: Pavel Tupitsyn
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: .NET, ASP.NET
>
> IGNITE-3199 introduced session store provider which works via full .NET API 
> that starts JVM in process.
> Introduce {{IgniteThinSessionStateStoreProvider}} that uses thin client API.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to