[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Denis Magda updated IGNITE-1811:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
Reproducible example: https://gist.github.com/aboudnik/3419fdc3872cc3051a1d

See attached screenshot for sampling info.

Issues found:
# entry is created with putIfObsoleteOrAbsent() even if store and swap are 
disabled
# no need to create DhtGetFuture on primary when there is no ongoing 
rebalancing 

Make sure the performance is fixed for ATOMIC and TRANSACTIONAL REPLICATED & 
PARTITIONED caches.

  was:
Reproducible example: https://gist.github.com/aboudnik/3419fdc3872cc3051a1d

See attached screenshot for sampling info.

Issues found:
# entry is created with putIfObsoleteOrAbsent() even if store and swap are 
disabled
# no need to create DhtGetFuture on primary when there is no ongoing 
rebalancing 


> Get from backup in Dht cache can be optimized
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-1811
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1811
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Yakov Zhdanov
>            Assignee: Yakov Zhdanov
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.6
>
>         Attachments: Screenshot 2015-10-29 18.04.07.png
>
>
> Reproducible example: https://gist.github.com/aboudnik/3419fdc3872cc3051a1d
> See attached screenshot for sampling info.
> Issues found:
> # entry is created with putIfObsoleteOrAbsent() even if store and swap are 
> disabled
> # no need to create DhtGetFuture on primary when there is no ongoing 
> rebalancing 
> Make sure the performance is fixed for ATOMIC and TRANSACTIONAL REPLICATED & 
> PARTITIONED caches.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to