[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15026751#comment-15026751
 ] 

Andrey Gura commented on IGNITE-1544:
-------------------------------------

1. I think that two versions is better for now.  
2. Only three lines that calculates nodes for task execution can be moved as 
common part. But it doesn't make sense in current situation (very big class and 
new method will lead to some confusion).
3. Ok.

PR updated.

> Make sure objects number stored in a cache can be bigger than 
> Integer.MAX_VALUE
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-1544
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1544
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: cache
>    Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>            Reporter: Denis Magda
>            Assignee: Andrey Gura
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> Make sure that a cache (partitioned) can actually hold number of objects 
> bigger than {{Integer.MAX_VALUE}}. Because {{Integer.MAX_VALUE}} is not 
> enough for some life use cases and business domains.
> At least the following should be done:
> - IgniteCache must return cache size as a {{long}} value;
> - Make sure (make a test) that a partitioned cache can store number of 
> objects much bigger than {{Integer.MAX_VALUE}};
> - find and edit info regarding this limitation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to