[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15018020#comment-15018020
 ] 

Andrey Gura edited comment on IGNITE-1544 at 11/20/15 1:37 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

{{sizeLong}} methods family added. Tests with onheap, onheap+offheap and 
onheap+offheap+swap passed with {{Integer.MAX_VALUE + 100_000}} entries.

Please review PR https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/252


was (Author: agura):
{{sizeLong}} methods family added. Tests with onheap, onheap+offheap and 
onheap+offheap+swap passed.

Please review PR https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/252

> Make sure objects number stored in a cache can be bigger than 
> Integer.MAX_VALUE
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-1544
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1544
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: cache
>    Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>            Reporter: Denis Magda
>            Assignee: Denis Magda
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> Make sure that a cache (partitioned) can actually hold number of objects 
> bigger than {{Integer.MAX_VALUE}}. Because {{Integer.MAX_VALUE}} is not 
> enough for some life use cases and business domains.
> At least the following should be done:
> - IgniteCache must return cache size as a {{long}} value;
> - Make sure (make a test) that a partitioned cache can store number of 
> objects much bigger than {{Integer.MAX_VALUE}};
> - find and edit info regarding this limitation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to