[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15000979#comment-15000979
 ] 

Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-1678:
--------------------------------------

Fixed some bugs in implementation. Now all tests pass.

Benchmarking status
- I benchmarked old and new implementation only on local machine (3 clients, 2 
servers)
- Current benchmark results show direct dependency between 
atomicSequenceReserveSize and op/sec. Look like only number of transactions 
cache op-s have meaning. Need to check it with many phisicale machines
- Need to solve with default percentage value.

Left:
- Add tests on new reserevePercetage paramether
- Create runners of GridCachePartitionedAtomicSequenceMultiThreadedTest in 
another modes: replicated, transactional
- Benchmark with many phisicale machines

> IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-1678
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: data structures
>    Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>            Reporter: Denis Magda
>            Assignee: Artem Shutak
>             Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> In current implementation a new reservation is made when the current local 
> sequence boundary is exceeded.
> In cases when there are many nodes that use the same atomic sequence there 
> can be a situation when all the nodes start doing a new reservation at the 
> same time. This can lead to performance drops.
> As a performance optimization it makes sense to start reserving new sequence 
> slot in advance (in background), like when around 80% of current reservation 
> has already been used. Probably we should add a special parameter to 
> {{AtomicConfiguration}} that will manage such behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to