[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-13293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15197341#comment-15197341
 ] 

Xuefu Zhang commented on HIVE-13293:
------------------------------------

Yes, the result can vary from query to query due to the cost of a separate 
sampling spark job.  I'd image that the benefit diminishes  as the data to be 
processed get smaller.

While we are here, [~Lifeng Wang], could you check if SamplingOptimizer, which 
does the similar thing for MR, also has the same effect for MapReduce engine? 
Thanks.

> Query occurs performance degradation after enabling parallel order by for 
> Hive on sprak
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-13293
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-13293
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Spark
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Lifeng Wang
>
> I use TPCx-BB to do some performance test on Hive on Spark engine. And found 
> query 10 has performance degradation when enabling parallel order by.
> It seems that sampling cost much time before running the real query.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to