[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-13213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15183595#comment-15183595 ]
Alan Gates commented on HIVE-13213: ----------------------------------- Well, not necessarily. As it stands now non-ACID readers get read committed consistency. So you're arguing that both acid and non-acid tables should have the same consistency model. I need to think about that. It's not obvious to me whether that should be true or not. > make DbLockManger work for non-acid resources > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HIVE-13213 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-13213 > Project: Hive > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Transactions > Affects Versions: 1.0.0 > Reporter: Eugene Koifman > Assignee: Eugene Koifman > Attachments: HIVE-13213.patch > > > for example, > insert into T values(...) > if T is an ACID table we acquire Read lock > but for non-acid table it should acquire Exclusive lock -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)