[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-13213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15183595#comment-15183595
 ] 

Alan Gates commented on HIVE-13213:
-----------------------------------

Well, not necessarily.  As it stands now non-ACID readers get read committed 
consistency.  So you're arguing that both acid and non-acid tables should have 
the same consistency model.  I need to think about that.  It's not obvious to 
me whether that should be true or not.

> make DbLockManger work for non-acid resources
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-13213
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-13213
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Transactions
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0
>            Reporter: Eugene Koifman
>            Assignee: Eugene Koifman
>         Attachments: HIVE-13213.patch
>
>
> for example,
> insert into T values(...)
> if T is an ACID table we acquire Read lock
> but for non-acid table it should acquire Exclusive lock



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to